Both the Ranger and the Tacoma have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, post-collision automatic braking systems, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available four-wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Ford Ranger is safer than the Toyota Tacoma:
|
|
Ranger |
Tacoma |
| OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
| HIC |
110 |
248 |
| Neck Injury Risk |
29% |
42.8% |
| Neck Stress |
281 lbs. |
456 lbs. |
| Neck Compression |
34 lbs. |
35 lbs. |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
144/203 lbs. |
290/453 lbs. |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
| HIC |
157 |
252 |
| Chest Compression |
.4 inches |
.6 inches |
| Neck Injury Risk |
34.9% |
64% |
| Neck Stress |
152 lbs. |
339 lbs. |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
210/102 lbs. |
461/454 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Ford Ranger is safer than the Toyota Tacoma:
|
|
Ranger |
Tacoma |
|
|
Into Pole |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
302 |
334 |
| Spine Acceleration |
32 G’s |
38 G’s |
| Hip Force |
473 lbs. |
516 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

